Chris Walsh (chris_walsh) wrote,
Chris Walsh

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Becket blatherings by this boy

I've just seen an acting feat of Peter O'Toole's: it's possible to play a character of deep feeling and shallow thought.

I'm home from Becket (1964) at Cinema 21; I'm glad I went. It's a film both elegant and charmingly sly, and funnier than I was expecting. As many of the reviews have pointed out, O'Toole (as Henry II) and his friend Richard Burton (as Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas Becket) clearly relished playing off of each other.

I liked how O'Toole plays Henry II as a man with lusty appetites who seems to be analyzing those appetites from a slight distance; he's not quite clinical when discussing how well-shaped a mistress's thigh is, for instance, but the very fact that he's discussing the shape of her thigh as if it's on display shows a strange almost-but-not-quite detachment...or as if, maybe, he can't quite articulate why he enjoys what he enjoys. Again, that interesting contradiction of "deep feeling and shallow thought." I'm not sure how well I'm explaining. It's late. But that idea struck me. (And by the way, does John Gielgud as King Louis VII smile through his entire role?) But anyway, a good, satisfying film.

Edited To Add, 3/26/07: Here's what Mike Russell had to say about the film.
Tags: film reviews

  • Thinking About Sad.

    Today I got sad news. Not directly-me sad news: sad news for others. In one case, the sudden death of a film columnist I’ve read and appreciated; in…

  • Out-Of-Context Theater.

    “Must be related to Magnolia 2: Delmer Lives.”

  • On Driving

    Good: I didn’t get used to it. From the second half of January to early March, Mom let me borrow her car so I wouldn’t have to deal with a closure…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.